The MalaysianDRG Casemix System: Financial Implications of Inaccurate Clinical Documentation and Coding Error
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: A casemix system measures costs of health service provision that is crucial in the planning and hospital budgeting. The MalaysianDRG casemix system has been implemented since 2010, yet many health professionals were unaware of its importance. To highlight this problem, we estimated the miscalculation of costs in providing treatment, that occurred due to inaccurate clinical documentation and coding error in the MalaysianDRG casemix system. Methods: Using a cross-sectional study design, 226 coded case notes from two healthcare institutions in Malaysia were selected and re-coded. If a difference between codes was observed, the new code would be chosen as the final code. The cases were then re-grouped using the MalaysianDRG casemix system. The cost per case de- rived from the new and original codes was compared. Then, the outcomes were verified by a casemix expert from the Ministry of Health. Results: Results indicated 61.9% inaccurate clinical documentation and 25.2% coding error. The difference in costs of treatment provision, due to inaccurate clinical documentation was RM227,657 and RM 68,216 for coding error. Using paired t-test analysis, differences between mean (SD) cost per case of the original vs. new codes due to inaccurate clinical documentation [RM10,208.19(12273) vs. RM11,244.53(13785.27), p<0.05], and coding error [RM10,208.19(12273.04) vs. RM11,215.52(13798.03) p<0.05] were statistically significant. These results raised important questions regarding costly financial implications arising from inaccurate clinical documen- tation and coding error in the MalaysianDRG casemix system. Conclusion: To achieve the full benefit of the Malay- sianDRG casemix system, the quality and accuracy of its data must first be established.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Sin Chew Jit Poh. The government subsidies 98% of the cost of medical services,. Sing Chew Jit Poh Malaysia. 2005 23 April 2005.
11th Malaysia Plan. Eleventh Malaysian Plan Chapter 4 Improving Wellbeing For All2016 5 August 2018 5 August 2018]. Available from: www.epu.gov.my/en/rmk/eleventh-malaysia-plan-2016-2020.
UNU. Casemix Improves Hospital Care In Malaysia. Health, Technology & Innovation [Internet]. 2011 6 August 2018; 2018(24 November 2018). Available from: https://unu.edu/news/news/casemix-improves-hospital-care-in-malaysia.html.
Zafirah S, Amrizal M, Sharifah E, Aljunid SM. Incidence of clinical coding errors and implications on casemix reimbursement in a teaching hospital in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2017;17(2):19-28.
Zafirah S, Nur AM, Puteh SEW, Aljunid SM. Potential loss of revenue due to errors in clinical coding during the implementation of the Malaysia diagnosis related group (MY-DRG®) Casemix system in a teaching hospital in Malaysia. BMC health services research. 2018;18(1):38.
Casemix KKM. Casemix System MalaysianDRG V2 application. 2017.
Duckett SJ. Casemix funding for acute hospital inpatient services in Australia. Med J Aust. 1998;169 Suppl:S17-21.
Bhasker, Coatesworth. How much are coding errors costing us? The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2016;98(5):209-10.
Aljunid SM, Srithamrongsawat S, Chen W, Bae SJ, Pwu R-F, Ikeda S, et al. Health-care data collecting, sharing, and using in Thailand, China mainland, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and Malaysia. Value in Health. 2012;15(1):S132-S8.
Ali J, Aljunid SM, Amrizal MN, Zafar A, Dexter VD. Development of MY-DRG casemix pharmacy service weights in UKM Medical Centre in Malaysia. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015;23(1):14.
Amrizal M, Rohaizat Y, Zafar A, Saperi SA, Aljunid S. Case-mix costing in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia hospital a top-down approach: cost analysis for cardiology cases. MJPHM. 2005;5(Supplement 2):33-44.
Case-mix Unit. Overview of Case-mix System. 2016.
MOH. Malaysia Health System Review. Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies,. 2013;Vol 3(No 1).
Moshiri H, Aljunid SM, Amin RM, Ahmed Z. Impact of Implementation of Case-mix System on Efficiency of a Teaching Hospital in Malaysia. Global Journal of Health Science. 2010;2(2):91.
Jameson, Reed. Payment by results and coding practice in the National Health Service; The Importance For Orthopaedic Surgeons. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2007.
Khwaja, Syed, Cranston. Coding Errors: A Comparative Analysis Of Hospital And Prospectively Collected Departmental Data. BJU International. 2002;89(3):178-80.
Kevin Mani JL, Lars Holmberg, Anders Wanhainen,. Challenges in analysis and interpretation of cost data in vascular surgery,. Journal of Vascular Surgery,. 2010;Volume 51, Issue 1,.
Mahbubani K, Georgiades F, Goh EL, Chidambaram S, Sivakumaran P, Rawson T, et al. Clinician-directed improvement in the accuracy of hospital clinical coding. Future Hospital Journal. 2018;5(1):47-51.
Nouraei SAR, Virk JS, Hudovsky A, Wathen C, Darzi A, Parsons D. Accuracy of clinician-clinical coder information handover following acute medical admissions: implication for using administrative datasets in clinical outcomes management. Journal of Public Health. 2015;38(2):352-62.
Medical Development Division. Garis Panduan Audit Ketepatan & Kesempurnaan Dokumentasi Klinikal dan Ketepatan Penetapan Kod ICD-10. In: Perubatan BP, editor. Edisi Ketiga ed: Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia; 2019.
McNutt R, Johnson TJ, Odwazny R, Remmich Z, Skarupski K, Meurer S, et al. Change in MS-DRG assignment and hospital reimbursement as a result of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid changes in payment for hospital-acquired conditions: is it coding or quality? Quality Management in Healthcare. 2010;19(1):17-24.
Cheng P, Gilchrist A, Robinson KM, Paul L. The risk and consequences of clinical miscoding due to inadequate medical documentation: a case study of the impact on health services funding. Health Information Management Journal. 2009;38(1):35- 46.