Outcome Analysis of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Main Article Content

Rendra Mahardhika Putra
Raden Mohammad Budiarto
Johanes Nugroho Eko Putranto
Nadya Luthfah
Muhammad Rifqi Arya Putra
Ariikah Dyah Lamara
Ryan Enast Intan
Wynne Widiarti

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a severe condition associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) have emerged as advanced treatment modalities. This study aimed to systematically compare clinical outcomes between CDT and MT in this population. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023460836) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, SAGE Journals, and Cochrane up to January 6, 2025. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1. Results: Eight studies involving 5,438 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups (CDT: 2.31%; MT: 2.96%; RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.48–1.38; p = 0.45). MT was associated with a significantly reduced ICU length of stay (SMD 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15–0.62; p = 0.001). Rates of significant bleeding (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.70–1.47; p = 0.93) and major complications (RR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.36–1.45; p = 0.37) were comparable between groups. Post-procedural pulmonary artery pressure improved in both groups, with a slight advantage toward MT (SMD −0.17, 95% CI: −0.29 to −0.05; p = 0.006). Conclusion: CDT and MT demonstrate favorable outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk PE. MT may offer shorter ICU stays and improved pulmonary artery pressure, whereas other clinical outcomes appear comparable. Treatment should be individualized according to patient condition, bleeding risk, and institutional expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rendra Mahardhika Putra, Raden Mohammad Budiarto, Johanes Nugroho Eko Putranto, Nadya Luthfah, Muhammad Rifqi Arya Putra, Ariikah Dyah Lamara, Ryan Enast Intan, & Wynne Widiarti. (2026). Outcome Analysis of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 22(2), 1554. https://doi.org/10.47836/mjmhs.v22i2.1554
Section
Systematic Reviews

References

Huang W, Goldberg RJ, Anderson FA, Kiefe CI, Spencer FA. Secular trends in occurrence of acute venous thromboembolism: the Worcester VTE study (1985–2009). Am J Med. 2014;127(9):829–839.e5. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.03.041

Zuin M, Becattini C, Piazza G. Early predictors of clinical deterioration in intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: clinical needs, research imperatives, and pathways forward. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024;13(3):297–303. doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zhad072

Harjola VP, Mebazaa A, Čelutkienė J, Bettex D, Bueno H, Chioncel O, et al. Contemporary management of acute right ventricular failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Association and the Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(3):226–241. doi:10.1002/ejhf.478

Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543–603. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405

Giri J, Sista AK, Weinberg I, Kearon C, Kumbhani DJ, Desai ND, et al. Interventional therapies for acute pulmonary embolism: current status and principles for the development of novel evidence: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;140(20)–e801. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000707

Bloomer TL, El-Hayek GE, McDaniel MC, Sandvall BC, Liberman HA, Devireddy CM, et al. Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: results of a multicenter registry and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89(4):754–760. doi:10.1002/ccd.26900

Toma C, Bunte MC, Cho KH, Jaber WA, Chambers J, Stegman B, et al. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in a real-world pulmonary embolism population: interim results of the FLASH registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;99(4):1345–1355. doi:10.1002/ccd.30091

Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Jaff MR, Ouriel K, Engelhardt TC, Sterling KM, et al. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed, low-dose fibrinolysis for acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: the SEATTLE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(10):1382–1392. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.020

Banovac F, Buckley DC, Kuo WT, Lough DM, Martin LG, Millward SF, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(1):44–53. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.09.011

Wells G. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. In: 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics; 2000 Jul 3–5; Oxford, UK. [cited 2024 Apr 30]. Available from: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573950400960524672

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(6):1785–1805. doi:10.1177/0962280216669183

Avgerinos ED, Abou Ali A, Toma C, Wu B, Saadeddin Z, McDaniel B, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus suction thrombectomy in the management of acute pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(5):623–628. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.002

Feroze R, Arora S, Tashtish N, Dong T, Jaswaney R, Castro-Dominguez Y, et al. Comparison of large-bore thrombectomy with catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of pulmonary embolism. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023;2(1):100453. doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100453

Graif A, Patel KD, Wimmer NJ, Kimbiris G, Grilli CJ, Upparapalli D, et al. Large-bore aspiration thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism: a propensity score–matched comparison. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(12):2052–2059. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.027

Inci EK, Khandhar S, Toma C, Licitra G, Brown MJ, Herzig M, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy versus catheter directed thrombolysis in patients with pulmonary embolism: a multicenter experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101(1):140–146. doi:10.1002/ccd.30478

Jaber WA, Gonsalves CF, Stortecky S, Horr S, Pappas O, Gandhi RT, et al. Large-bore mechanical thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis in the management of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: primary results of the PEERLESS randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2024. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072364

Sedhom R, Elbadawi A, Megaly M, Athar A, Bharadwaj AS, Prasad V, et al. Outcomes with catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. catheter-directed embolectomy among patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism: a nationwide analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023;12(4):224–231. doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zhac095

Tran A, Toma C, Jaber W, Heintz J, Matthai WH, Palevsky H, et al. Cost-comparison of mechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024;3(2):101187. doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101187

Tsukagoshi J, Wick B, Karim A, Khanipov K, Cox MW. Perioperative and intermediate outcomes of patients with pulmonary embolism undergoing catheter-directed thrombolysis vs percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(6):101958. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.03.005

Vedantham S, Goldhaber SZ, Julian JA, Kahn SR, Jaff MR, Cohen DJ, et al. Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(23):2240–2252. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1615066

Kennedy RJ, Kenney HH, Dunfee BL. Thrombus resolution and hemodynamic recovery using ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(6):841–848. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.018

Tapson VF, Sterling K, Jones N, Elder M, Tripathy U, Brower J, et al. A randomized trial of the optimum duration of acoustic pulse thrombolysis procedure in acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: the OPTALYSE PE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(14):1401–1410. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.030

Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BC, Carpenter JS, Cognard C, Dippel D, et al. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(6):612–632. doi:10.1177/1747493018778713

Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et al. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e46–e110. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000158