Increasing Source-Object Distance: A Computed Radiography- based Strategy to Reducing Radiation Dose in Occipital-Frontal Skull X-Ray

Main Article Content

Nurazizah Mohd Yusoff
Nurul Fadhlina Ismail

Abstract

Introduction: Exploring potential optimization strategies and developing evident practices is critical. Previous studies show that radiation dose can be reduced by increasing the source-image distance (SID). Although most studies use digital radiography, many hospitals in underdeveloped countries still use computed radiography (CR). Therefore, research will investigate the relationship between SID and Entrance surface dose (ESD) using the CR. Methods: This study involved the measurement of radiation dose and image quality of a radiological procedure performed at a refer- ence SID; 100cm and the tested SIDs; 110cm, 120cm, and 130cm, using constant technical factors (70kVp, 25mAs, grid). A LiF; Mg Ti thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD-100) chip was placed in the center of the radiation field of the OF10° skull radiography examination to measure ESD. Image quality was assessed using the European Commis- sion guidelines and graded using relative visual assessment analysis (VGA). Results: Significant ESD reduction from 21% and 45% when SID was increased from 100cm to 130cm (p <0.001), where SID was negatively correlated with ESD (r= - 0.98). The VGA scores showed no statistical difference in the image quality of the OF10° skull radiography examination for the tested and reference images (p=0.21). VGA scores for 120cm images showed the highest image quality among the SIDs tested with a dose reduction of 37%. Conclusion: ESD was statically reduced when SID was increased from 100cm to 130cm, while image quality was diagnostically acceptable. The study suggests that 120cm is the optimal SID when both dose and image quality are considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mohd Yusoff, N., & Ismail, N. F. (2023). Increasing Source-Object Distance: A Computed Radiography- based Strategy to Reducing Radiation Dose in Occipital-Frontal Skull X-Ray. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 19(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.47836/mjmhs.19.1.16
Section
Original Articles

References

Holmberg O, Malone J, Rehani M, McLean D, Czarwinski R. Current issues and actions in radiation protection of patients. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76(1):15–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.033.

Fairuz MN, Azlinawati A. Study on the Computed Tomography Dose Index volume and CT Mode Relationship in Multislice CT Scan. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res. 2014;16(1):213–22.

Wan AYH, Shih MH, Lai BMH, Chu CY, Tang KYK, Chan RTM, et al. Achievable radiation dose reduction with comparable image quality in chest radiography. Hong Kong J Radiol. 2014;17(3):182–8. doi: 10.12809/hkjr1413198

Inyang, S. O., Essien, I. E., & Antia AD. Entrance Surface Air Kerma for Chest X-ray Examination in some Diagnostic Radiologic Facilities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Radiat Sci Technol 2016; 2016;2(1):6–12.

Joyce M, McEntee M, Brennan PC, O’Leary D. Reducing dose for digital cranial radiography: The increased source to the image-receptor distance approach. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2013;44(4):180–7. doi: 10.1016/J. JMIR.2013.07.002

Poletti JL, McLean D. The effect of source to image-receptor distance on effective dose for some common X-ray projections. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(933):810–5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/74823655.

Robinson J, McLean D. Extended focal-film distance technique: an analysis of the factors in dose reduction for the AP knee radiograph. Radiography. 2001;7(3):165–70. doi: 10.1053/ RADI.2001.0324

Poletti JL, McLean D. The effect of source to image-receptor distance on effective dose for some common X-ray projections. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(933):810–5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/74823655.

Lança L, Franco L, Ahmed A, Harderwijk M, Marti C, Nasir S, et al. 10kVp rule - An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom imaging study using a CR system: Impact on image quality and effective dose using AEC and manual mode. Radiography. 2014;20(4):333–8. doi:10.1016/j. radi.2014.04.007

Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Kaste SC, Bulas D, Frush DP, Butler P, et al. Image gently: Ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194(4):868-73. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4091.

Cotelo, E., Padilla, M., & Dibarboure, L. (2008). Radiation doses in pediatric computed tomography procedures: challenges facing new technologies. IRPA 12: 12 International congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA): Strengthening radiation protection worldwide, Argentina: SAR.

Brennan PC, McDonnell S, O’Leary D. Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for x-ray examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;108(3):263–8. doi: 10.1093/ RPD%2FNCH029

Mohammed Ali A, Hogg P, England A. Dose optimisation in paediatric radiography – Using regression models to investigate the relative impact of acquisition factors on image quality and radiation dose. Phys Medica. 2019;68:61–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.034

Lai ZH, Sá dos Reis C, Sun Z. Effective dose and image optimisation of lateral lumbar spine radiography: a phantom study. Eur Radiol Exp. 2020;4(1). doi: 10.1186/s41747-019-0132-3.

Karami V, Zabihzadeh M, Danyaei A, Shams N. Efficacy of increasing focus to film distance (FFD) for patient’s dose and image quality in pediatric chest radiography. Int J Pediatr. 2016;4(9):3421–9. doi: 10.22038/IJP.2016.7319

Lorusso JR, Fitzgeorge L, Lorusso D, Lorusso E. Examining practitioners’ assessments of perceived aesthetic and diagnostic quality of high kVp-Low mAs pelvis, chest, skull, and hand phantom radiographs. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2015;46(2):162–73. doi: 10.1016/j. jmir.2015.01.109.

Tugwell J, Everton C, Kingma A, Oomkens DM, Pereira GA, Pimentinha DB, et al. Increasing source to image distance for AP pelvis imaging-Impact on radiation dose and image quality. Radiography. 2014;20(4):351–5. doi: 10.1016/J. RADI.2014.05.012

Kumar S, Moro L, Narayan Y. Morbidity among X-ray technologists. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33(1):29–40. doi:10.1016/J.ERGON.2003.06.002

Pascual TNB, Chhem R, Wang SC, Vujnovic S. Undergraduate radiology education in the era of dynamism in medical curriculum: An educational perspective. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(3):319–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.039

Joyce M, O’Leary D. The Increased Source to Image-receptor Distance Technique: What Is Preventing Implementation in Clinical Practice? J Med imaging Radiat Sci. 2014;45(3):260–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2014.04.003.

Harjai MM, Sharma AK. Head Injuries in Children : Role of X-Ray Skull, Ct Scan Brain and in-Hospital Observation. Med J Armed Forces India. 1998;54(4):322–4. doi: 10.1016/S0377- 1237%2817%2930595-6

Dendy PP. Principles of radiological physics. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(917):461–461. doi: 10.1259/ bjr.77.917.770461