Prosthetic Rehabilitation Technique with an Economical Customized Orbital Prosthesis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Post-surgical orbital defects pose a severe effect on patient, psychologically and physically, especially in the eventual return to the society and daily routine. In cases where reconstructive surgery is not possible, prosthetic rehabilitation is crucial in addressing this issue. Implant-supported orbital prosthesis provides superior retention, however, it is not economically acceptable for some cases. Various modes of retention are available to cater to each patient’s diagnosis, treatment need and economical status. This article describes the procedures in the construction of a customized silicone orbital prosthesis using adhesive and spectacles for retention. This technique is cost-effective and simple while providing comfort and satisfaction for the patient.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Lekay-Adams M, Sykes LM, Du Plessis F. Prosthetic challenges in a patient with ocular evisceration and global preservation: A case report. S Afr Dent J. 2014;69(1):15-7.
Kiat-amnuay S, Gettleman L, Khan Z, Goldsmith LJ. Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses. Part I: Skin dressings and solvent removers. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(3): 335-40. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109507.
Aalaei S, Abolhassani A, Nematollahi F, Beyabanaki E, Mangoli AA. Fabrication of an implant-supported orbital prosthesis with bar-magnetic attachment: A clinical report. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(12):932- 5.
Shrestha B, Thaworanunta S. Orbital prosthesis fabrication: Current challenges and future aspects. Open Access Surgery. 2016;9:21-8. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S81435.
ElKhashab MA, Radi IAW, Elkhadem AH. Implant prognosis in irradiated versus non-irradiated nasal, orbital and auricular sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(5)636-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.09.010.