SMA Syndrome – Wait & Nurture
Main Article Content
Abstract
Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is rare with the common presentation of megaduodenum from entrapment of the third part of the duodenum (D3) by the SMA. We present a case report of a thin, fit 16-year-old boy, active smoker complaining of generalized colicky abdominal pain associated with persistent postprandial vomiting. Small bowel study demonstrated partial duodenal obstruction from compression of the third part of the duodenum by the SMA. Computed tomography of the abdomen shows an aorto-mesenteric angle of 13 degrees with aorto-mesenteric distance of 0.32 cm, indicating SMA syndrome. His symptoms resolved spontaneously with watchful waiting and nutritional care plan. The success was contributed to restoring the fat cushion around the SMA, hence, widening the aorto-mesenteric angle. In conclusion, watchful waiting with a nutritional care plan is a feasible initial strategy in the approach to SMA syndrome. However, should this strategy be unsuccessful, the choice of surgical treatment is duodenojejunostomy.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Chan DKH, Mak KSW, Cheah YL. Successful nutritional therapy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Singapore Med J. 2012;53(11):233–6.
Serralde Zúñiga AE. The Two Sides of Superior Mesenteric Artery Compression Treatment: Conservative Or Surgical Management. Nutr Hosp [Internet]. 2017 Jul 28;34(4). doi: 10.20960/nh.1006
Lee TH, Lee JS, Jo Y, Park KS, Cheon JH, Kim YS, et al. Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome: Where Do We Stand Today? J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(12):2203–11. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2049-5
Salem A, Al Ozaibi L, Nassif SMM, Osman RAGS, Al Abed NM, Badri FM. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: A diagnosis to be kept in mind (Case report and literature review). Int J Surg Case Rep [Internet]. 2017;34:84–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.03.018
Ganss A, Rampado S, Savarino E, Bardini R. Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome: a Prospective Study in a Single Institution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(5):997–1005. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3984-6