Patient-Specific Design of Passive Prosthetic Leg for Transtibial Amputee: Analysis Between Two Different Designs

Main Article Content

Muhammad Hanif Baharuddin
Amir Mustakim Ab Rashid
Ahmad Kafrawi Nasution
Hong Seng Gan
Muhammad Hanif Ramlee

Abstract

Introduction: Amputee patients are usually utilized prosthetic leg for daily activities such as walking, climbing, and running. However, the current prosthetic leg that available from the market often associated with poor comfortability due to its conventional way of socket manufacturing. Therefore, this research aims to build custom-made passive transtibial prosthetic legs and to evaluate the aspects of biomechanical analysis. Methods: The residual leg of a subject was scanned using the Sense three-dimensional scanner. By referring to scanned residual leg model, two design of prosthetic legs which are the low-cost solid ankle cushion heel (SACH) foot (D1), and the high-cost flex foot (D2), were developed by using computer aided software (CAD), SolidWorks and Meshmixer. Each of the components were then meshed with triangle edge length of 5 mm in 3-Matic software. Marc.Mentat software was used to simulate the midstance phase of a gait cycle where an axial load of 350 N was applied. Results: The overall maximum stress of the D1 (190.2 MPa) was higher than D2 (38.47 MPa). In addition, socket and pylon in D1 showed tendency to yield because the maximum stress is higher than yield stress of respective materials. In displacement analysis, D2 showed higher overall displacement than D1 because the flex foot has higher flexibility. Conclusion: From overall result, prosthetic leg of D2 is better in biomechanical strength as compared with the D1 because it can withstand the loading from subject’s weight without showing any sign of yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Baharuddin, M. H., Ab Rashid, A. M., Nasution, A. K., Gan, H. S., & Ramlee, M. H. (2021). Patient-Specific Design of Passive Prosthetic Leg for Transtibial Amputee: Analysis Between Two Different Designs. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 17(4), 228–234. Retrieved from http://mjmhsojs.upm.edu.my/index.php/mjmhs/article/view/487
Section
Original Articles

References

World Report on Disability. World Health Organization. 2011.

Sakaguchi D. Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation. Physiotherapy Canada. 2013;65(4):399.

The rehabilitation of people with amputations. World Health Organization. 2004.

ISO 8549-1: Prosthetics and Orthotics. International Standards Organization. 1989;1.

Arifin, N., Hasbollah, H. R., Hanafi, M. H., Ibrahim, A. H., Rahman, W. A. W. A., & Aziz, R. C. Provision of prosthetic services following lower limb amputation in Malaysia. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2017 24(5):106.

Edelstein J. Amputations and Prostheses. Cameron, M., Monroe, L. Physical Rehabilitation: Evidence- Based Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2007:267- 99.

Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, Burgess AR. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2001;80(8):563-71.

Meulenbelt HE, Geertzen JH, Jonkman MF, Dijkstra PU. Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2009;90(1):74-81.

Schmalz T, Blumentritt S, Jarasch R. Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait:: The influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components. Gait & posture. 2002;16(3):255-63.

Herr HM, Grabowski AM. Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;279(1728):457-64.

Lusardi MM, Jorge M, Nielsen CC. Orthotics and prosthetics in rehabilitation-e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.

Day S. Using rapid prototyping in prosthetics: Design considerations. Rapid Prototyping of Biomaterials: Elsevier; 2020. p. 325-38.

Sanders JE, Rogers EL, Sorenson EA, Lee GS, Abrahamson DC. CAD/CAM transtibial prosthetic sockets from central fabrication facilities: How accurate are they? Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 2007;44(3):395.

Omasta M, Palou ek D, Návrat T, Rosický J. Finite element analysis for the evaluation of the structural behaviour, of a prosthesis for trans-tibial amputees. Medical engineering & physics. 2012;34(1):38-45.

Ali I, Kumar R, Singh Y. Finite Element Modelling and Analysis of Trans-Tibial Prosthetic Socket. Global Journal of Research In Engineering. 2014.

Kahtan YY. Below Knee Prosthesis Modal Analysis. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. 2019;10(1):2127-32.

Radi SK. Stress Distributions of Lower Limb Prosthetic Socket. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. 2017;11(3).

Powelson T, Yang JJ, editors. Prosthetics for Transtibial Amputees: A Literature Survey. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; 2011.

Amsan AN, Nasution AK, Ramlee MH, editors. A Short Review on the Cost, Design, Materials and Challenges of the Prosthetics Leg Development and Usage. International Conference of CELSciTech 2019-Science and Technology track (ICCELST-ST 2019); 2019: Atlantis Press.

Balaramakrishnan TM, Natarajan S, Srinivasan S. Roll-over shape of a prosthetic foot: a finite element evaluation and experimental validation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 2020;58(10):2259-70.

Casallas EC, Luengas LA, Garzón EY, editors. Modeling a transtibial prosthesis. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education; 2011: IEEE.

Saad H, Abdullah MQ, Wasmi HR. The Modeling and Effect of FEM on Prosthetic limb. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology. 2017;7(3):892-5.

Rohjoni FM, Ab Patar MNA, Mahmud J, Lee H, Hanafusa A. Finite element analysis of a transtibial prosthetic during gait cycle. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research. 2020;9(5):764-70.

Tavangarian F, Proano C, Zolko C, editors. Performance of Low-Cost 3D Printed Pylon in Lower Limb Prosthetic Device. TMS 2019 148th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings; 2019: Springer.

Fadzil WFAW, Mazlan, M. A., Abdullah, A. H., Hanapiah, F. A., & Pangesty, A. I. . Effects of Infill Density on 3D Printed Socket for Transtibial Prosthetic Leg. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2020;9(1):229-38.

Rochlitz B, Pammer D. Design and analysis of 3D printable foot prosthesis. Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering. 2017;61(4):282-7.

Cheung JT, Zhang M, Leung AK, Fan YB. Three- dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing—a material sensitivity study. Journal of biomechanics. 2005 May 1;38(5):1045-54.