Food Choice Motives, Physical Activity Level and Body Mass Index Status Among Undergraduates Students: A Cross-sectional Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: University students had high risk of unhealthy lifestyle habits such as being sedentary and having poor dietary choices due to higher cost of healthy food and the wide availability of fast food. These may contribute to over- weight, obesity and co-morbidities. The aim of the study was to determine the association of food choices motives, physical activity (PA) level and body mass index status among undergraduates in Universiti Sains Malaysia. Meth- ods: A total of 125 undergraduate students were recruited. Self-reported online questionnaire was administered to obtain information about sociodemographic information, anthropometric measurements, food choice motives using Food Choices Questionnaire and physical activity using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. The association between food choice motive, PA and body mass index was assessed using Spearman correlation and Fisher`s Exact Test. Results: The three most important food choice motives are religion, price and sensory appeal. A total of 16% of the subjects were underweight, 19.2% were overweight and 11.2% were obese. 21.6% of the students had low PA level. There was significant inverse association between sensory appeal and BMI (p = 0.002, r = - 0.269). Physical activity was not significantly different between BMI categories. Conclusion: Those who have lower BMI reported to have greater sensory appeal, but association between PA and body mass index had no significant difference. Future studies are required for understanding the direct impact of food choice motives on dietary quality and its association with PA motivation and BMI status for reducing the prevalence of obesity among undergraduates.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Bailey CP, Sharma S, Economos CD, Hennessy E, Simon C, Hatfield DP. College campuses’ influence on student weight and related behaviours: A review of observational and intervention research. Obes Sci Pract. 2020;6(6):694-707. doi: 10.1002/osp4.445.
Wan Mohamed Radzi CW, Salarzadeh Jenatabadi H, Alanzi AR, Mokhtar MI, Mamat MZ, Abdullah NA. Analysis of obesity among Malaysian university students: A combination study with the application of Bayesian structural equation modelling and Pearson correlation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3):492. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030492.
Bernardo GL, Jomori MM, Fernandes AC and Proenca RP. Food intake of university students. Revista de Nutrição. 2017; 30: 847-865. doi: 10.1590/1678-98652017000600016
Gan W, Nasir MM, Zalilah MA and Hazizi SA. Differences in eating behaviours, dietary intake and body weight status between male and female Malaysian university students. Malays J Nutr. 2011; 17(2): 213-228.
Tok CY, Siti RA and Koh DS. Dietary habits and lifestyle practices among university students in Universiti Brunei Darussalam. Malays J Med Sci. 2018; 25(3): 56-66. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.3.6
Kinlen D, Cody D and O’Shea D. Complications of obesity. QJM-Int J Med. 2018; 111(7), 437– 443. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx152.
Peltzer K and Pengpid S. The association of dietary behaviors and physical activity levels with general and central obesity among ASEAN university students. AIMS Public Health. 2017; 4(3): 301-313. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.3.301
Fagaras SP, Radu, LE and Vanvu G. The level of physical activity of university students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015; 197: 1454-1457. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.094
Ahn SH, Um YJ, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Oh SW, Lee CM, et al. Association between physical activity levels and physical symptoms or illness among university students in Korea. Korean J Fam Med . 2016; 37: 279-286. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2016.37.5.279.
Nantel J, Mathieu ME and Prince F. Physical activity and obesity: biomechanical and physiological key concepts. J Obes. 2011: 1-10. doi: 10.1155/2011/650230.
Wan NA. Introduction to sample size calculation. EIMJ. 2013; 5(2): 89-96.
Tan KC. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. The lancet. 2004; 363(9403): 157-163. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3.
Asma’ A, Nawalyah AG, Rokiah MY, R and Talib N. Comparison of food choice motives between malay husbands and wives in an urban community. Malays J Nutr. 2010; 16(1): 69-81.
Steptoe A, Pollard TM, Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite. 1995; 25: 267– 284. doi: 10.1006/appe.1995.0061.
Veer B, Ghanekar J and Dasila P. Are we physically active? Assessment using Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). IJHSR 2018; 8(4): 137-142.
Ganasegeran K, Al-Dubai SA, Qureshi AM, Al-abed AAAA, Rizal AM and Aljunid SM. Social and psychological factors affecting eating habits among university students in a Malaysian medical school: a cross-sectional study. Nutr J. 2012; 48: 1-7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-48.
Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P, Prakash MV, Amalraj V. Prevalence of overweight/obesity among the medical students, Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2012;67(4):442-4.
Suzanah AR, Muhammad MA and Najibatul RM. Determinants of food choice among adults in an urban community.; A highlight on risk perception. Nutr Food Sci. 2013; 43(5): 413 - 321. doi: 10.1108/NFS-07-2012-0072
Sathyamala C. Meat-eating in India: Whose food, whose politics, and whose rights?. Policy Futures Educ. 2019;17(7):878-91. doi: 10.1177/1478210318780553
Pondor I, Gan WY and Appannah, G. Higher dietary cost is associated with higher diet quality: a cross-sectional study among selected Malaysian adults. Nutrients. 2017;9(9): 1028. doi: 10.3390/nu9091028
Al-Aklabi N, Al-Dowsari W and Andrioti D. Investigating the correlation between food prices and university students awareness of the effects of fast food consumption on their health. Int J Family Community Med. 2016;1: 114 - 119. doi: 10.15344/2456-3498/2016/114
Norhasmah S, Zuroni MJ and Marhana AR. Food insecurity among public university students receving financial assistance in Peninsular Malaysia. Malys J Consum Fam Econ. 2013; 16(1): 78-90.
Acebes-Sánchez J, Diez-Vega I and Rodriguez-Romo G. (2019). Physical activity among spanish undergraduate students: a descriptive correlational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16(15): 2770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152770.
Stephen JA, Elias RB, Gilbert BR, Farid NA, Han DT and Atang SP. Physical activity among UNIMAS undergraduates. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2021; 13(04), 83-87. doi: 10.31782/IJCRR.2021.SP123
Goje M, Salmiah MS, Ahmad Azuhairi A and Jusoff, K. Physical inactivity and its associated factors among university students. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014; 13(10), 119-130. doi: 10.9790/0853-13101119130
Castro O, Bennie J, Vergeer I, Bosselut G and Biddle SJ. How sedentary are university students? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Sci. 2020;21:332-43. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8.
Liem DG and Russell CG. The influence of taste liking on the consumption of nutrient rich and nutrient poor foods. Front Nutr. 2019;6(174):1-10. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00174.
Rankin A, Bunting BP, Poínhos R, Lans IA, Fischer AR, Kuznesof S, et al. Food choice motives, attitude towards and intention to adopt personalised nutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2018; 21(4): 2606 - 2616. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001234.
You H, Tan P and Mat Ludin A. The relationship between physical activity, body mass index and body composition among students at a pre-university centre in Malaysia. Int Med J Malays. 2020; 19(2): 85 - 87. doi: 10.31436/imjm.v19i2.1567
Martín IS, Vilar EG, and Barato VP. Exercise and body mass index: are those two parameters related in adults? Journal of Negative & No Positive Results (JONNPR). 2016; 1(1): 36-41. doi: 10.19230/jonnpr.2016.1.1.935
Grasdalsmoen M, Eriksen HR, Lønning KJ. and Sivertsen B. Physical exercise and body-mass index in young adults: a national survey of Norwegian university students. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7650-z.