Evaluation of Occupational Radiation Exposure to Undergraduate Students During Clinical Training in Radiology Department
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Assessing radiation exposure is a vital step in determining the potential health risks associated with radiation and identifying the necessity for protective measures. The study assesses the occupational radiation dose encountered by undergraduate students specializing in diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy (DIR) during their clinical training in the radiology department. Materials and methods: An analysis was conducted to compare individual exposure doses with the dose limits established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), concurrently assessing the variations in mean effective doses among distinct student cohorts. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD) were employed to monitor 143 students across five cohorts from 2017 to 2022. The electronic Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (e-SSDL) information security management system tracked the deep (Hp(10)) and shallow (Hp(0.07)) dose equivalents of DIR students. Results: The mean values for accumulated Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) were found to be 0.51 and 0.50 mSv, respectively, averaged over 800 hours of clinical training. The highest recorded exposure was 1.30 mSv, signifying that the radiation exposure experienced by DIR students was well below the threshold. The mean annual effective radiation dose per student amounted to 0.17 mSv. Small but significant difference (p < 0.001) in the radiation exposure between five cohorts was observed with increments over a 5-year period. Conclusion: The students' radiation dose was notably below the ICRP dose limit of 6 mSv/year designated for trainees. These results indicate the efficacy of the existing radiation protection measures during clinical training, reducing the likelihood of overexposure.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Bouchareb Y, Al-Maimani N, Al-Maskery I, Al-Zeheimi H, Al-Rasbi A, Al-Dhuhli H, et al. Assessment of Occupational Radiation Doses in Different Diagnostic, Interventional and Therapeutic Radiology and Molecular Imaging Services in Oman. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2021;197(1):36-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab152
Shubayr N, Alashban Y, Almalki M, Aldawood S, Aldosari A. Occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiology workers in the Saudi ministry of health hospitals and medical centers: a five-year national retrospective study. Journal of King Saud University-Science. 2021;33(1):101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.101249
Kim J, Cha ES, Choi Y, Lee WJ. Work procedures and radiation exposure among radiologic technologists in South Korea. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2018;178(4):345-353. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx120
Osei E, Nuru F, Moore M. Assessment of occupational radiation doses of medical radiation workers in two community hospitals. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2020;192(1):41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaa190
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Individual Monitoring for Internal Exposure of Workers: Replacement of ICRP Publication 54. ICRP Publication 78; 1998.
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60; 1991.
Commissioner of Law Revision. Atomic Energy Licensing Act 1984. Act 304; 2006.
Mishra DR, Paliwal L, Sutar SS, Singh AK. Development of optically stimulated luminescence badge reader system for individual monitoring of radiation workers. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2020;191(1):25-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaa128
Alashban Y, Shubayr N, Alohaly A, Aloraini S, Alamri R, Alghamdi SA. Occupational Doses to Radiography Internship Students in Saudi Arabia Using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2021;194(2):163-168. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncab094
Sudchai W, Sa-Ngan-Sat A. Inlight optically stimulated luminescence for occupational monitoring service in Thailand. Progress in Nuclear Science and Technology. 2012;3:94-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.15669/pnst.3.94
International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103; 2007.
Lee WJ, Choi Y, Ko S, Cha ES, Kim J, Kim YM, et al. Projected lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea. BMC cancer. 2018;18:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5107-x
Adliene D, Griciene B, Skovorodko K, Laurikaitiene J, Puiso J. Occupational radiation exposure of health professionals and cancer risk assessment for Lithuanian nuclear medicine workers. Environmental Research. 2020;183:109144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109144
Boice Jr JD, Cohen SS, Mumma MT, Howard SC, Yoder RC, Dauer LT. Mortality among medical radiation workers in the United States, 1965–2016. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2023;99(2):183-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2021.1967508
Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, Steelman C. Measurements of radiation exposure of radiography students during their clinical training using thermoluminescent dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2018;179(3):244-247. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx261
Sarowi SM, Ramli SA, Kontol KM, Abd Rahman NA. Occupational exposure assessment: Practices in Malaysian nuclear agency. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2016;1704(1): 05001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940097
Onyema EM, Eucheria NC, Obafemi FA, Sen S, Atonye FG, Sharma A, et al. Impact of Coronavirus pandemic on education. Journal of Education and Practice. 2020;11(13):108-121. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/11-13-12
Stracke CM, Sharma RC, Bozkurt A, Burgos D, Cassafieres CS, dos Santos AI, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on formal education: an international review of practices and potentials of open education at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2022;23(4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i4.6120
Aristovnik A, Keržič D, Ravšelj D, Tomaževič N, Umek L. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12(20):8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
Rainford LA, Zanardo M, Buissink C, Decoster R, Hennessy W, Knapp K, et al. The impact of COVID-19 upon student radiographers and clinical training. Radiography. 2021;27(2):464-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.10.015
Elshami W, Abuzaid MM, McConnell J, Floyd M, Hughes D, Stewart S, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on the clinical experience and training of undergraduate Student radiographers internationally: The clinical tutors’ perspective. Radiography. 2022;28:S59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.012
Alhasan M, Al-Horani Q. Students’ perspective on the online delivery of radiography & medical imaging program during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2021;52(4):68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2021.07.009
O'Connor M, Lunney A, Potocnik J, Kearney D, Grehan J. Supporting radiography clinical placements in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: the practice educators perspective. Radiography. 2023;29(2):379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.01.018
Yukihara EG, McKeever SW, Andersen CE, Bos AJ, Bailiff IK, Yoshimura EM, et al. Luminescence dosimetry. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2022;2(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00102-0
Oliver L, Candela-Juan C, Palma JD, Pujades MC, Soriano A, Vilar J, et al. Comparison of the dosimetric response of 4-elements OSL and TL passive personal dosimeters. Radiation Measurements. 2017;107:128-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.09.001
Kry SF, Alvarez P, Cygler JE, DeWerd LA, Howell RM, Meeks S, et al. AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs. Medical Physics. 2020;47(2):19-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13839
Yukihara EG, McKeever SW, Akselrod MS. State of art: Optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry–Frontiers of future research. Radiation Measurements. 2014;71:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.03.023
Omer H, Salah H, Tamam N, Mahgoub O, Sulieman A, Ahmed R, Abuzaid M, Saad IE, Almogren KS, Bradley DA. Assessment of occupational exposure from PET and PET/CT scanning in Saudi Arabia. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2023;204:110642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110642
Garcia-Sanchez AJ, Garcia Angosto EA, Moreno Riquelme PA, Serna Berna A, Ramos-Amores D. Ionizing radiation measurement solution in a hospital environment. Sensors. 2018;18(2): s18020510. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020510
Chida K. What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?. Radiological Physics and Technology. 2022;15(2):101-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-022-00660-8
Abuzaid M, Noorajan Z, Elshami W, Ibham M. Monitoring Occupational Radiation Dose in Radiography Students: Implications for Safety and Training. Safety. 2024;10(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10020035