Analysis of Characteristics and Immunogenic Response of Scafold Hydroxyapatite Gypsum Puger Combination of Cassava Starch as Bone Graft Material
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: A bone graft is a bone replacement material that is widely used in grafting damaged bone. The bone graft material being developed is a combination of hydroxyapatite (HAp) gypsum puger and cassava starch scaffold. Bone graft material must have the characteristics of the material according to standards, osteogenesis and not cause an immunogenic response. This study aimed to analyze characteristics and responses immunogenic from a combination HAp gypsum puger scaffold cassava starch as a bone graft material. Materials and methods: Scaffold HAp gypsum puger and Cassava starch were tested using XRD, compressive test, and immunogenic assay. Application of scaffolds to rats for 7 and 14 days. Blood samples were taken and tested for IgG levels using Elisa. Results: XRD test results, obtained high peaks in HAp gypsum puger scaffold and cassava starch. compressive strength test of HAp gypsum puger scaffold and cassava starch (50:50) of 2.07 MPa. The results of Ig G on day 14 on HAp scaffolding gypsum puger and cassava starch did not cause immunogenic reactions. Conclusion: In the XRD test, high peaks are produced indicating the purity of HAp. In the compressive strength test of the HAp gypsum scaffold group Cassava starch Puger 50:50 obtained 2.07 MPa.. immunogenic test analysis of scaffold HAp gypsum puger cassava starch in rats on day 14 did not cause immunogenic reactions.
Downloads
Article Details
References
A. Albalooshy, M. Duggal, K. Vinall-Collier, B. Drummond, and P. Day, “The outcomes of auto-transplanted premolars in the anterior maxilla following traumatic dental injuries,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 39, no. S1, pp. 40–49, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1111/edt.12829
S. Vargas et al., “Clinical protocol selection for alveolar ridge augmentation at sites exhibiting slight, moderate, and severe horizontal ridge deficiencies,” vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 174–196, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10239
M. T. V. Rodrigues, G. A. Guillen, F. G. C. Macêdo, D. R. Goulart, and C. F. Nóia, “Comparative Effects of Different Materials on Alveolar Preservation,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 213–223, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.10.008.
M. P. Ferraz, “Bone Grafts in Dental Medicine: An Overview of Autografts, Allografts and Synthetic Materials,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 11. MDPI, Jun. 01, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ma16114117.
M. Goutam, N. Batra, K. Jyothirmayee, N. Bagrecha, P. Deshmukh, and S. Malik, “A Comparison of Xenograft Graft Material and Synthetic Bioactive Glass Allograft in Immediate Dental Implant Patients,” vol. 14, no. 1, pp. s980–s982, 2022. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_808_21
M. M. Rad et al., “Fabrication of elastin additive on polymethyl methacrylate and hydroxyapatite-based bioactive bone cement,” Mater Chem Phys, vol. 280, p. 125783, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2022.125783.
M. Janmohammadi et al., “Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery,” Bioactive Materials, vol. 20. KeAi Communications Co., pp. 137–163, Feb. 01, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.018.
Q. Zhang et al., “3D printing method for bone tissue engineering scaffold,” Med Nov Technol Devices, vol. 17, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.medntd.2022.100205.
S. K. Bhullar, D. G. Ruzgar, S. Saber-Samandari, M. Sadighi, S. Ahadian, and M. Ramalingam, “Impact of Nanophase Hydroxyapatite-Based Biomaterials on Tissue Engineering,” vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 469–477, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbns.2018.1566
H. S. Sohn and J. K. Oh, “Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries,” Biomaterials Research, vol. 23, no. 1. BioMed Central Ltd., Mar. 14, 2019. doi: 10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y.
A. Naini, I. Ketut Sudiana, M. Rubianto, and N. Mufti, “Characterization and Degradation of Hydroxyapatite Gypsum Puger (HAGP) Freeze Dried Scaffold as a Graft Material for Preservation of the Alveolar Bone Socket,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.jidmr.com. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_443_19
A. Naini et al., “Inflammatory and immunogenic response of the tissue after application of freeze-dried hydroxyapatite gypsum puger scaffold compared to freeze-dried hydroxyapatite bovine scaffold,” Contemp Clin Dent, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 371–375, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_443_19.
A. Naini, A. Sumono, R. Parnaadji, N. Hendrijantini, and S. Khaerunnisa, “Expression of Stro-1, Runx-2, Osterix, and Alp in Alveolar Bone Regeneration Process Following the Administration of Hydroxyapatite Gypsum Puger (HAGP) Scaffold,” Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 145–151, 2023, doi: 10.47836/mjmhs19.3.19.
M. Tianyu Zhang et al., “Hydroxyapatite/Polyurethane Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering,” vol. 30, no. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2023.0073
Z. Wang, P. Mhaske, A. Farahnaky, S. Kasapis, and M. Majzoobi, “Cassava starch: Chemical modification and its impact on functional properties and digestibility, a review,” Food Hydrocoll, vol. 129, p. 107542, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2022.107542.
A. Naini and D. Rachmawati, “Physical characterization and analysis of tissue inflammatory response of the combination of hydroxyapatite gypsum puger and tapioca starch as a scaffold material,” Dent J, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 53–57, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v56.i1.p53-57.
S. Oktaviyani and dan Fitri Afriani, “PERANCAH TULANG BERBASIS KOMPOSIT HIDROKSIAPATIT/SILIKA MELALUI METODE 3D-PRINTING: SEBUAH KAJIAN NARATIF,” JoP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22437/jop.v6i1.10598
W. Wang and K. W. K. Yeung, “Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review,” Bioactive Materials, vol. 2, no. 4. KeAi Communications Co., pp. 224–247, Dec. 01, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007.
X. Li et al., “Experimental measurement and simulation of mechanical strength and biological behavior of porous bony scaffold coated with alginate-hydroxyapatite for femoral applications,” Compos Sci Technol, vol. 214, p. 108973, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2021.108973.
N. J. Szymanski, S. Fu, E. Persson, and G. Ceder, “Integrated analysis of X-ray diffraction patterns and pair distribution functions for machine-learned phase identification,” NPJ Comput Mater, vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41524-024-01230-9.
W. Rosalina, A. Pascawinata, and M. Roesnoer, “KARAKTERISTIK SCAFFOLD HIDROKSIAPATIT DARI GIGI MANUSIA MENGGUNAKAN UJI X-RAY DIFFRACTION (XRD).” doi: 10.33854/JBDjbd.105
C. Koski and S. Bose, “Effects Of Amylose Content On The Mechanical Properties Of Starch-Hydroxyapatite 3d Printed Bone Scaffolds,” Addit Manuf, vol. 30, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100817.
Y. J. Cheng, T. H. Wu, Y. S. Tseng, and W. F. Chen, “Development of hybrid 3D printing approach for fabrication of high-strength hydroxyapatite bioscaffold using FDM and DLP techniques,” Biofabrication, vol. 16, no. 2, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad1b20.
V. Vishwanath, Development of Silk Fibroin/Chitosan Based Porous Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. National Institute of Technology Rourkela: Departemen of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s13726-016-0492-y
C. V Maduka et al., “Regulating the proinflammatory response to implanted composite biomaterials comprising polylactide and hydroxyapatite by targeting immunometabolism”, doi: 10.1101/2023.10.21.563447. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.21.563447
J. Yang et al., “Employing Piezoelectric Mg2+-Doped Hydroxyapatite to Target Death Receptor-Mediated Necroptosis: A Strategy for Amplifying Immune Activation,” Advanced Science, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1002/advs.202307130.
V. T. Weligama Thuppahige, L. Moghaddam, Z. G. Welsh, T. Wang, and A. Karim, “Investigation of critical properties of Cassava (Manihot esculenta) peel and bagasse as starch-rich fibrous agro-industrial wastes for biodegradable food packaging,” Food Chem, vol. 422, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136200.