Repositioning an Implant-retained Auricular Prosthesis using a Custom Acrylic Base: A Case Report
Main Article Content
Abstract
Prosthetic rehabilitation offers an alternative to surgical procedures for repositioning implant-retained auricular prosthesis. This report illustrates a prosthetic rehabilitation of a 15-year- old male with a unilateral microtia who presented with an unfavorable implant-retained left auricular prosthesis. The implants placed seven years ago were drifted posterosuperior away from the ideal ear canal position. The fabrication of a new prosthesis on the existing bar-clip attachment using a custom acrylic base was planned to correct the location. A skin colour perforated custom acrylic base was fabricated and designed to extend anteriorly, therefore, shifting the prosthesis forwards into a more natural location. The custom base was able to relocate the prosthesis’ position without compromising its retention whilst engaging the existing implant attachment. This in turn enhanced prosthesis acceptability and improved the patient’s confidence. The custom acrylic base serves as a viable option to reposition the prosthesis influenced by age related growth and development.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Sencimen M, Gulses A. Implant retained auricular prostheses. Current Concepts in Plastic Surgery. 2012;50-66. doi: 10.5772/27030.
Arora V, Sahoo NK, Gopi A, Saini DK. Implant retained auricular prostheses: a clinical challenge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(5):631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.12.011.
Wang R. Presurgical confirmation of craniofacial implant locations in children requiring implant retained auricular prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(4):492-5. doi: 10.1016/s00223913(99)80020-1.
Dahm MC, Shepherd RK, Clark GM. The postnatal growth of the temporal bone and its implications for cochlear implantation in children. Acta Oto-laryngol. 1993;113(sup505):4-39. doi: 10.3109/00016489309128539.
Prasad DA, Prasad DK. Effect of implant placement in growing adults on craniofacial development: A literature review. J Dent Implant. 2012;2(2):97. doi: 10.4103/0974-6781.102222.